this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

22536 readers
1739 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

Indiana Jones is a tough watch. Had to turn it off after 30 minutes or so

Edit: Since a lot of people misunderstand me here.

This is Indiana Jones, something I watch purely for entertainment, its not very entertaining to watch him berate and belittle a overly hysterical depiction of a woman for a full length movie. It's not as if this is the absolute pinnacle of human culture, its a movie series made for entertainment. It still was an important part of the human experience for many. If my goal is to get a glimpse into how culture was earlier, then sure, but that was not my goal when I watched Indiana Jones.

I loved Indiana Jones as a child, and wanted to introduce it to my wife as ENTERTAINMENT, not as an important cultural event that forever changed human culture.

Sexism, homophobia, transphobia and racism was normal in older movies, and one should not dismiss old culture based solely on that. Many films are too great to pass up, Indiana Jones is not what I would prioritize to watch despite these issues.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hopefully your don't take that approach to everything cause being unable to mentally get over the fact people were different at different points in history. Sure makes it damn well near impossible to be well read or learned.

You basically are willfully ignorant and blind to history. If you just can't read or watch anything that doesn't perfectly match modern sensibilities.

The sheer glut of fiction that is so unbelievably foundational to modern literature that is beyond racist and sexist. Is uncountable.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago

It's not even a good movie to begin with, no need to give it a pass on the sexism and other issues

[–] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 week ago

Of course not. This is Indiana Jones, something I watch purely for entertainment, its not very entertaining to watch him berate and belittle a overly hysterical depiction of a woman for a full length movie. It's not as if this is the pinnacle of human culture, its a movie series made for entertainment. If my goal is to get a glimpse into how culture was earlier, then sure, but that is not my goal when I watch Indiana Jones.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

Early 2000s entertainment too. A good portion of the edgy jokes could be considered funny because they were made on the assumption that "We can laugh about this, because we all know racism and sexism is bad, right?".

And then 2015ish happened and it became obvious that a lot of people weren't laughing AT the -isms but rather WITH.

EDIT: Which slur did Ross use, BTW? I haven't watched that show in eons, and I don't remember any.

Round of applause to Deep Space 9 for holding up after all these years, half that station was bi at the very least.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

I had a hardcover book sitting on my shelf. Got it at a yard sale a while back. "The 13 Crimes of Science Fiction," it was published in 1979 and most of the stories are much older.

The level of racism was pretty amazing. One story referred to a mugger as a 'black buck' Another was set centuries in the future and had an anthropologist keeping some 'primitive' people in high tech chains and cages.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

Agatha Christie is probably one of the most popular writers of the 20th Century, and one of her classics is now published under the title "And Then, There Were None."

If you've ever seen a movie, play, or game where a group of people are invited to a house only to be killed off one by one, you've seen something influenced by "And Then, There Were None".

Generally the victims are symbolized by figurines on the mantelpiece which get gradually destroyed one by one as the murders progress, eventually leaving "none".

The previously published title was the incredibly culturally insensitive "Ten Little Indians", and the figurines were just that.

The original published title, in the UK, in 1939 - an era when we DID IN FACT KNOW BETTER was "Ten Little removeds".

They did not change the title in the UK until 1985(!)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_Then_There_Were_None

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

Is quoting Wikipedia now banned on Lemmy? I was under impression arsehole censoring mods here were mostly focused on removing mentions of Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

“Ten Little removeds”.

so for anyone else confused...

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

"Content not viewable in your region"?

Now I'm more confused.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

There you go. This censorship is getting ridiculous. Next time people born in Fucking, Austria won't be able to explain where they are from.

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

Chuds not being able to post the N word for a day — challenge level: impossible.

Like, we all knew what the book was, but it was still SO important for you to post this. It was life or death for you. Not saying slurs physically makes your skin crawl. You cannot help but be a racist sack of shit.

I would personally send you to the gulag.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

As an Australian who has never studied Agatha Christie in any context, I literally had no clue what the censored word was. I was, and am, appreciative of the context that was provided by other commenters. Be careful when you make blanket statements like “we all knew what the book was”, because you’ll almost always be confidently incorrect.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago

You are speaking to a tankie. They are confidently incorrect pretty much by definition.