this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
199 points (99.5% liked)

Games

46906 readers
919 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The full article that was hinted at in interviews last week.

There are likely a few reasons behind this shift. One is that several recent PlayStation games have not sold well on PC.

Interesting...

But the strategy has been muddled and confused many players. Most PC releases arrived months or years after the games came to PlayStation. The cadence was never consistent, and the announcements appeared to be haphazard. The company also upset PC players by asking them to create PlayStation Network accounts to access many of the games.

I love Horizon: Zero Dawn. I have not played Horizon: Forbidden West. By the time it came to PC, Sony started making PSN logins necessary to even authenticate the game in the first place, which is basically just the worst kind of DRM. They've reverted this policy, but now I don't trust them. They put out a handful of games on GOG where I don't have to trust them, and I'll probably still pick a few of those up one day, but Forbidden West isn't there. Seems to me that they have no idea how badly they screwed up this rollout themselves. Oh, Uncharted 4 didn't do too well on PC? Where are the PC versions of Uncharted 1-3? Where can I play the original God of War trilogy? I'm not buying a PlayStation no matter how many exclusives you lock up there, so I'll just continue to not play your handful of exclusives.

Anyway, that's my two cents.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

Damn, I was really looking forward to Ghost of Yotei after falling in love with Ghost of Tsushima. I bet Sony is betting they can snag guys like me into a console purchase for whatever the favorite franchise sequel release is. Idk if that’s a Japanese cultural misunderstanding or just plain stupidity, but they’re gonna be disappointed.

[–] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 77 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I understand porting costs money but they kept selling old games for new game prices.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 57 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, Sony is baffled why the people willing to wait over 2 years for the game to come to PC are choosing to wait some more to get it cheaper instead of buying it at full price.

Then scratch their heads when Helldivers 2 releases at the same time as the PS5 and PC outsells the PS5

Helldivers 2 has sold 12 million copies on Steam alone, while PlayStation 5 sales are estimated at 5 million units.

https://tech4gamers.com/helldivers-2-sold-more-on-pc-than-ps5/

And Sony's response is to continue to delay for years before releasing to PC expecting PC gamers to have the same enthusiasm for a release years later as they would a day 1 launch.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

We'll see this again when Marvel Tokon comes out.

load more comments (1 reply)
[–] who@feddit.org 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

And at least some of their flagship games were ported to PC by a developer that didn't bother with optimization, leading to ridiculously high system requirements, so only a fraction of PC gamers would reasonably be able play them. (I'm looking at you, The Last of Us.)

High prices, late releases, badly performing ports, forced online accounts... Each of these mistakes is a slap in a potential customer's face. Together, they practically guarantee poor sales.

Maybe they think recent RAM and GPU prices will lead many PC gamers to start buying Playstations? I doubt it.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, if they already made me wait past GOTY podcast spoiler season, I'm far less willing to pay full price for it anymore.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 13 points 14 hours ago (1 child)

Leadership is out of touch with the market/reality.

First, hardware costs are going way up. People will be less likely to buy multiple hardware platforms to play your exclusive games.

Second, I'm not buying a PS4 or 5 or 6 just to play Bloodborne. Literally the only reason I care about this.

But that's okay, there's plenty of other things to play and it's only getting better behind an emulator so you may lose a purchase there.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 11 hours ago

Corporate suits love ignoring player feedback and telling people they're wrong.

No, we're goddamn sick of enshittification and would rather PlayStation failed than give into it.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

That's not going to get me to buy a PS6. PS5 is at least my only (UHD) Blu-ray player that I rarely ever play games on. Not buying another PlayStation in the future for not even averaging 1 exclusive game a year that I'd want to play

[–] nick_ocb@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

Sony's PC pivot reversal is a bold bet. They've spent years building PC goodwill—abandoning it suggests they're seeing data we don't.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 14 hours ago (1 child)

From one of the other articles about this I read, they are seeing the same data but interpreting dumbly. They aren't seeing the kind of explosive sales they want during the period the games are locked to the Playstation and it doesn't pick up after they release it to other platforms because the hype train has halted by then.

Why they think just dropping other platforms will help more than simultaneously releasing them everywhere is pretty silly when that is their reasoning.

[–] Ashtear@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

When almost half of their income comes from MTX and other services purchases, their first-party games were never, ever going to be simultaneous releases. Sony wants as many users platformed in their ecosystem as possible, and exclusivity is one of the ways you do that. This was a pretty simple ROI calculation, and when you're already losing Steam's cut, it would take solid performance to be worthwhile.

The above comment mentions goodwill, and that's another thing; Sony burnt up the goodwill they earned with PC users (and probably then some) with the PSN nonsense for these ports. It's like how Nvidia continually gets bad press for their gaming GPU division, at some point you gotta look at how it's affecting your overall brand.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 30 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

This is why Xbox dying is a bad thing.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 point 7 hours ago

Exactly. This is Sony declaring victory in the console wars. You could argue "But Nintendo", but Nintendo was never playing the same game as Sony & Microsoft. You want to play Nintendo games, you buy a Nintendo. You want to play Sony games, Sony says you have to buy a Sony PlayStation.

I'm not a fan, but it could work.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 44 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

It was too little, too late, too expensive. Logically it would sell less than expected after a lame attempt.

[–] 64bithero@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

Gamers are being shown more then ever their buying older games not newest ones. Part of this is the eshitification of the industry.

The problem is the ports a lot of the time are awful.

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 9 points 18 hours ago

Partly because newly released games are buggy and unfinished and they can take a while before they're stable and quality of life features fully in place.

I don't want to pay to be a beta tester, and I especially don't want to pay full price for that. I can wait a bit and get a better game for cheaper.

I've only bought a couple of games on early release or at release lately. Deep Rock Galactic Survivor because it had a demo I enjoyed, and Hades 2 because I trust that studio and Hades is one of my favourite games.

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.social 34 points 19 hours ago

I'll never buy a PlayStation. So I will just not play their games or will play them if they come to PC. That's it.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Uncharted 4 didn’t do too well on PC? Where are the PC versions of Uncharted 1-3

Release of 4 could have pushed a bunch of sales on a 1-3 PC collection as well! Release them at the same time, put the 1-3 collection on a discount and charge full price for 4. People will gobble up both. (I would put 4 on my wish list and buy the 1-3 collection in that situation, but that is still me giving them money for a two-decade-old game.)

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 6 points 18 hours ago

I'd do the same...

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I bought 4 cause its called legacy of thieves collection, so I thought it was going to be you know a collection of the whole series. Instead its just 4 and some DLC.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 21 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I still don't know why they sell one Uncharted game on Steam under the name "Uncharted Collection". It's just one game and some DLC.

Are you serious?! How is that ok?

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I was conned by this.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

As a PC player my rule of thumb is there has to be at least 10 great games on a console before I buy a console. I owned a PS4 because it crossed the threshold before they started releasing the games on PC.

Just one or two games on my wishlist for the PS5, at this rate I'll never buy one.

My guess is maybe they saw reduced console sales for folks like me?

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

I also had the 10 exclusive too for consoles, which is why I got the PS3 and PS4 Pro. PS5 doesn't meet it because they blew it on their live service attempts and it is crazy Naughty Dog has released nothing new that isn't a remake this gen.

I don't think I'll get another Sony console again even if they never port to PC except for jailbroken ones going forward.

load more comments (1 reply)
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 6 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

I think they're finally worried about Valve and Steam.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 5 points 14 hours ago

Every game they release on Steam is adding value to Valve's hardware. It's fundamentally not that different to Sony releasing games on the Xbox or Switch.

Potentially good for software sales, but a death sentence for future hardware sales that rely on exclusivity to justify the platform's existence.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago

That Steam is actually a competitor to Playstation. Even more so with the Steam Deck and future Steam Machine in living room. It's no longer this "oh it's PC, a different audience".

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 point 11 hours ago

I’ve bought almost everything they’ve released. The one major exception is Stellar Blade, which they infected with Denuvo malware. By the time they remove the malware — if they ever remove the malware — the amount I will be willing to pay is far less than what they asked for. Maybe $20 if I’m bored. Fuck Sony.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 2 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

A bit sad for me that I won't be playing the next Horizon game. Oh well. Enough other games to play. Maybe I'll buy the latest god of war game if the price comes down enough. I'm patient.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

You do not need to feel bad. The next Horizon game is a live service grift.

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

Ah, the Sony flip flop on exclusivity continues.

[–] Sunschein@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago

I'm going to cry if I don't get to play Wolverine, or the upcoming X-Men game after that. Still won't buy a console, though.

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They won't sell more consoles because of this decision and they won't get the PC money either. As for me, I'm fine with it. Better developers and published have fallen so far and yet we still have great games to play.

[–] brillotti@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

They would make so much money if they ported Bloodborne.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Destiny is on life support, Hunters Gathering is dead on arrival, Marathon's future is bleak, Concord is Concord, and the one studio that could've printed them easy money is dead because the sorry excuse of a circus that is Sony leadership really wanted a live service God Of War title. Gee, I wonder why sales are low.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

I would have purchased and played Sony games on Steam, if they did not require a Playstation account.

[–] 64bithero@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 child)

Putting games on PC works for third party publishers because it works perfectly with their business model. It works for Microsoft because they whole sale lost the console market and are slowly slinking their way out. Sony is still a huge contender in the console space and has no plans to cede any share. While it’s great for the consumer to have PC releases it hurts the console business. Regardless if you have a small sect of people who would never buy a console to begin with. For me I own a ps5 as well as a PC. I am more likely to buy the game on PC. Sony from there loses out on the maximum cut they could get from the game. They lose out on me needed to have ps plus to play online. Not to mention if the ps6 does cost close to the same as a PC having games on both leaves little incentive to buy the console.

I am not to mad about it, I rarely play my PS5 now I’ll have more incentive to buy the games knowing I won’t get a PC release.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

During the PS2 era, there were lots of reasons that a game might end up exclusive to one platform even if there was no deal involved. Now the only exclusives are the ones Sony makes themselves, so there's maybe one or two of those per year, and that doesn't guarantee that those one or two are going to be your cup of tea, let alone justify buying a dedicated machine for $500 just to play those few games. As opposed to a PC that plays every video game that isn't made by Sony or Nintendo. It gets harder and harder for that $500 to make sense, and the PC ports Sony had been doing was any attempt at all to recoup the money that they spent on blockbuster games that weren't growing their console install base.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I think this is more about user retention than additional sales. In a world where PC players stay on PC and console players stay on console, porting games to PC makes sense. However, with Steam OS making things easy and Microsoft’s plans for making the next Xbox a consoled-PC, there’s a much higher risk of PS players migrating to PC -particularly if their favorite exclusives are landing there anyway. And of course there’s no indication that PC players will ever invest in a console unless there are exclusives.

Furthermore, with rising costs of computer parts, Sony might have to subsidize their hardware a little bit more than they’re comfortable with, and that means they need players in their store buying games and not buying games from Steam.

And finally, it’s worth mentioning that Sony fumbled bad with first party games this gen, meaning the PS5’s success has been carried solely on the backs of 3rd parties. If PS players were to buy a Steam Machine, they would have almost no reason to ever buy a PS again unless Sony starts giving them a reason to.

So as much as it disgruntles all of us to not be able to buy all our games exactly where we want, it’s probably a smarter investment for Sony as a video game company to not be porting their games to PC.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

That's really disappointing, I was looking forward to the Returnal sequel and that Wolverine game.

load more comments
view more: next ›