• partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Are they loosing money on the OS? I don’t believe for a second that the capitalist company chooses less capital. But, maybe they’ve determined there’s more capital in less market share? What’s your theory, exactly?

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t believe for a second that the capitalist company chooses less capital.

      But what if it very slightly makes next quarter’s numbers go up? Any future cost might be worth that, after all.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Make it infeasible to run Windows on your personal machines by limiting how long you can use the hardware, but conveniently support it as a cloud vm service that is always guaranteed to work with a monthly subscription.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        Subscription fees plus the double dip into selling bulk licensing of your thin client to companies who make computers.