low empathy is a cognitive issue one cannot help

Nope, even without ASPD empathy is a learned skill that has to be developed. And someone with a totally broken oxytocin system can still conciously be empathetic with effort. I literally do it every day.

I do not need empathy to care for people.

Literally what empathy means…

Jokes on them, I was wasting my money on xbox’s subscription service at the time and didn’t have to buy it…

While age verification laws are almost always intended to spy on people and not protect kids…

Saying minors shouldn’t on social media is “ageist” makes it seem like the person who said it spends a lot of time on Roblox.

Either because they’re a kid themselves, or they think kids should be treated like adults in ways Epstein and trump also do.

Like, whoever wrote the blog headline is pretty suspect

No…

The first amendment protects against censorship by the American government, ideally at least.

Private companies can and do censor shit constantly, and that is definitely censorship.

You’ve just seen people repeat it about the first amendment, didn’t understand it, and are attempting and failing to regurgitate it

And if people see you using it wrong, they’ll start off from an even worse position.

All you’re doing is exacerbating the problem you think your fixing.

AI is the logical conclusion to McKinsey analysts…

Why pay a “coming soon ceo” to tell you to fuck over workers and raise CEO pay when you can program a computer to do it?

If it doesn’t tell them what they want to hear, it means it needs “tweaked” if it tells them their pre-existing opinion is right, then it’s not their idea anymore and the AI is to blame when it backfires.

it would have to be some serious quality of life changes to make me shell out for it again.

Eh, I first bought it 20 years ago, and have bought it a couple times since on different platforms.

If it’s $30 bucks I’m buying it regardless. Maybe not right at first, but eventually I will.

That’s also why I don’t think any game shouldnt be able to run “maxxed out” on release. A great game people are still gonna want to run it a decade later. It doesn’t hurt anyone if the dial turns to 11 if 10 is the same setting it’s always been.

So make games that in a decade still look decent on settings no one could enable all at once on release. It doesn’t change the quality on release, just gives it legs to look good longer.

Oblivion was alright, but I remember seeing most players topped out at like 5 hours played.

It was fun to see it all again, but the novelty wore off quick…

This tho, I could see sinking 10s likely 100s if hours into.

4 years newer doesn’t sound like much these days, but 2002 to 2006 was a huge jump. NV has a much better starting point for an update, and could feel like a truly modern game that pulls people in without having to drastically change the experience.

Plus the desert setting makes it easy to hide graphical shortcomings. So even after cranking the resolution up, it’s not gonna take a lot more resources, there’s plenty of room to improve other stuff too.

Yes…

This is an incredibly low empathy question.

Things that you’re not aware of still matter.

And this should be obvious, but a woman is a human, if she was really liberated from something, she would be aware of it. There is literally always an observer unless you’re so far gone you really don’t think a woman counts…

If that was a revolt then literally everything is a revolt, so why did you use a word that you believe to be meaningless and capitalize it like trump does?

No it wasn’t…

America was “founded” because the people who got rich early from none forcement of smuggling didn’t want to just stand by while the English government started to finally collect on due taxes.

It’s fucking crazy people still believe the shit we learned in elementary school.

It was “new money” revolting against “old money” and they only won because the French royal family wouldn’t too piss off the English royal so much it cost them their heads.

And even then he could do that with any food place that doesn’t display his name.

This has been happening since the 80s…

Now it’s completely unavoidable, unless it’s someone close to you that manages to do it to the pile at the last second.

Like, I’m not saying trump is rational, I’m explaining his irrational logic for why he got used to it.

Anywhere in the country and most of the planet, someone can go buy $200 worth of McDonald’s and delivery it in under an hour. It’s what he’s used to

It’s because he’s paranoid about being poisoned…

Long before he was president he’d send people “undercover” to buy large amounts of fast food, then he’d eat a random portion. I suspect he even has others eat from the total first. That’s why he always serves to cold to sports teams and the like. He’s used to the crazy delays it comes with, he’s likely never had it fresh.

It’s also why he’s so fat. If everytime you ate it was from a pile of cold fast food and even after full there’s a pile left, anyone would over eat and become as obese as trump. That would take a godawful amount of willpower to resist, but constantly caving to cravings would fundamentally rewire your brain.

The “panda effect”!

Does anyone else remember when pandas were white with black spots?! We jumped realities!

/s

I’d say uniqueness more.

If one species of 47 different kind of European Swallows go extinct, it’s just not a big deal because the niche will be refilled in a few generations and in a decade they’d be pretty much the same as the OG.

If something like a platypus was threatened with extinction, a lot more people would care, because what the actual fuck is a platypus?!

That weird fuck survived when everything tangentially related to it except one animal half a world away that looks nothing like it died off long ago.

That shit we need to protect. And I’d go farther and say we should encourage diversification of those species so an entire branch of our planets genetic history is pruned.

Like those tiny pools of water that have been separated from all other life for millenia, it’s not enough to protect those organisms and their tiny natural habitats. We should be encouraging their growth and evolution, because absolutely nothing else would increase our planets genetic diversity as much as those weird living fossils.

Because there’s also records of him getting wasted at the palace all day…

You can check out the Wikipedia, I didn’t link it a couple days ago and going off memory

Nanni wasn’t the only one, just the most famous.

Like, we found Ea Nasir’s house, and it was filled with evidence that at one time he was trustworthy, and then just went to shit.

Like, we know ~5 other customers of his by name because they also left written records about him not delivering or cheating in other ways.

It wasn’t a one off thing.

Stop burning the planet down to generate social media comments

I mean, I thought it would be obvious my issue was with using AI to do so…

Even if it had been a serious question.

But, to be fair I was thinking of what a normal.person would be able to parse, and not people who’s critical thinking had already atrophied from offloading to AI.

They probably don’t have any idea what I meant and would need it explicitly spelled out.

Stop burning the planet down to generate social media comments about shit you don’t understand

Lol:

The new YASA axial flux motor weighs just 28 pounds, or about the same as a small dog.

However, it delivers a jaw-dropping 750 kilowatts of power, which is the equivalent of 1,005 horsepower.

I feel like we’d need peak horsepower output of a small dog to truly understand this.

Eh, the issue is lots of people wouldn’t be willing to sell tho.

Like, you think an author wants the chatbot to read their collected works and use that? Regardless of if it’s quoting full texts or “creating” text in their style.

No author is going to want that.

And if it’s up to publishers, they likely won’t either. Why take one small payday if that could potentially lead to loss of sales a few years down the row.

It’s not like the people making the chatbits just need to buy a retail copy of the text to be in the legal clear.