Yeah, this headline is trying to make it seem like training on copyrighted material is or should be wrong.
Even_Adder
joined 2 years ago
Yeah, this headline is trying to make it seem like training on copyrighted material is or should be wrong.
They clearly only read the headline If they're talking about the ruling that came out this week, that whole thing was about trying to give an AI authorship of a work generated solely by a machine and having the copyright go to the owner of the machine through the work-for-hire doctrine. So an AI itself can’t be authors or hold a copyright, but humans using them can still be copyright holders of any qualifying works.