• chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I envision a future so shitty that people are willing to physically destroy data centers in self-defense. Putting them in space is a really good way to combat that.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Putting them in space also puts them technically outside of the legal jurisdiction of any country. I figure fElon probably assumes that means said servers can never be subpoenaed.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh yeah it’s totally a bullshit argument, it wouldn’t hold water in any court. Hell if nothing else, the ground stations like you said, or the country whose airspace the center exists over, would be in jurisdiction.

          But I do believe that Musk believes it’s a get out of jail free card.

          • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Agreed. The US can access/subpoena any data it wants from US companies, even if the servers they host the data on are in Europe or Asia or…

            It doesn’t matter where the servers and the data is located. It matters who posses (or controls the access) to it.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean a data center barge or one in Antarctica would do much the same and be wildly cheaper and (relatively) more practical.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Keep people from destroying data centers by having them destroy themselves? Is this some sort of zen koan?

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Putting data centers in space is a good way to keep people from destroying them. Thermodynamics on the other hand, will have a field day with them.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They aren’t maintained. They’re a constellation of small satellites in LEO like starlink that just go up and eventually come down.

        If they’re too far up latency would be too high

        No one is repairing any of these starlink type dishes.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Wasn’t it recently proven that the metals introduced into the upper atmosphere by satellites burning up depletes ozone? Its not a problem yet but maintaining constellations on the scale of cumulative several gigawatts of data centre would leave several tons of satellite burning up every single day. CFC Ozone hole is gonna look like a cloudy day in comparison.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I just wanted to add another note

            Even if this ozone thing turns out to not be true, there are still all sorts of other things being burned up in the atmosphere that can have other potential effects. It all needs to be studied given the size of these constellations.

            I wouldn’t be surprised if 50-60 years from now, if there is a real issue, that it eventually comes out that SpaceX or other mega constellation companies figured out it would be a problem, and just said nothing. Much like how big oil new CO2 was a problem forever ago and hid it.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I don’t think anything was proven yet, but something came out saying it warranted more studying?

            Satellites might need to be redesigned around it in the future and more studies should be done.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            If they stop working they will just de-orbit it early, or if they can’t cause it’s really broken, they’ll just wait the ~5-10 years to come down on it’s own.