this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
33 points (86.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

40907 readers
708 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They have made better by democratizing it and making more kinds of music accessible to more people on demand.

It‘s worse because music can be produced and uploaded by, at best, mediocre talent, and artists get paid a pittance. For every hundred songs, 3-5 might be “ok” and one or two are “keepers” if you’re lucky.

Gone are the days where bands have a string of bangers and albums loaded with great songs. A lot of music just seems to be thrown at the wall to see what sticks. There were a lot of downsides to major label controlled music industry, but they also made some great bands.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jcr@jlai.lu 1 point 1 hour ago

Streaming service is good for me because I access a much wider spectrum of music that I could possibly buy one by one.

It may be unfair or badly managed fpr artists remuneration, but usually they are paid on gigs not on royalties.

I don't see it that way. To me, it seems that there is a lot more great music available, and it takes much less effort to find it. Mass-market music is lowest-common-denominator crap, but that became the case somewhere in the 90s and hasn't changed since.

The sweet spot is to find artists who are popular on streaming services, but not nearly as popular as the heavily-marketed acts that fill stadiums. Then branch out from there. Maybe check out community playlists that don't contain big name acts and add anything that resonates to your own lists to get started?

[–] TheDoctorDonna@piefed.ca 1 point 6 hours ago

I'm the kind of person who is very particular about the music I listen to, the wrong music is over stimulating - so I love streaming in that I can curate my playlist and have new music recommended to me based on what I like. I honestly don't know how I would find new artists if it wasn't for streaming - not like there's an indie folk radio station I can just listen to..

I feel bad that the artists don't get paid much though and I was considering switching to buying albums again, but I think that might make it so I support a few artists more but a lot of artists I like would consequently be supported less.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 child)

I will take the glut of mediocre talent over the glut of equally mediocre talent but slickly produced corporate payola slop any day.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 7 hours ago

The major playlists are still payola, just by a different name

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

Streaming is crap, I collect albums instead. Nobody but burglars can limit my access to my music collection.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Nobody but burglars can limit my access to my music collection.

Or anything that forces you to leave home

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child)

No actually I can carry all the music I want in the storage of my phone. It's nice to have unlimited access to it even when there is no cellular data or wifi available. Sometimes I go fully out of range of all Internets but I still have music.

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That's nice for small collection, but I don't want to buy a 2 TB SD card for my phone that I then have to keep in sync, so streaming from my home server is a far better option.

And with a music play with a cache, you can still listen to your regular playlists while offline.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

You take it with you like the good old days

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child)

Early walkmans were quite unwieldy

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 hours ago

I had a Sony CD walkman, a later model with read ahead buffer. It did OK for normal walking.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

This is a weird take.....as someone who is a Indy artist who makes mediocre music I HARDLY "get paid". The amount I get paid doesn't even cover my yearly sub to distrokid...and I don't ever plan on making "hundreds" of songs. Like what??

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 point 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

That would be the “pittance” part. This is about a hundred random songs not a single artist.

This isn’t about you.

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 1 point 16 hours ago

i buy music, never spent a dollar on streaming