What kind of dog requests a tortilla chip to be removed rather than eating it? I’ve only had labs. You’re lucky if they don’t eat the bed as well for having once been near a chip.
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
9 points (69.6% liked)
Showerthoughts
40907 readers
578 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Depends what you count as “animals”. Because if ants get the vote, then we are all now vassals of one of the supercolonies.
For better or worse, relatively few animals live to the national voting age.
Hmm. An ant colony might count as a single organism. But I see your point.
We'd still keep them locked up and eat them. The farmers would just cut their tongues out right after birth to make it less awkward.
Jesus that's dark.
I was just contemplating whether civility stems from respect or force. I guess that answers that.
Next time I'll ask, "what if we gave all the animals machine guns?"
Then we'd send them to the front as drone fodder. We humans really do not have a good track record with the treatment of animals, regardless of how intelligent or sentient they are.
Bold of you to assume wed survive.
I once read a science fiction story. It was hundreds of years after ww whatever. All the animals were dead except for humans. So we differentiated our species into humans and cattle. The cattle humans were, as you might expect, beastile. There was even a sex scene.
Probably Philip Jose Farmer.
Uh huh. Anyway, I guess someone has to link this: https://static1.srcdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Far-Side-Dog-Translator.jpg
There would be an imminent civil war over veganism. 🐮🥩🤠
Did you see that recent tv show Pluribus? They were basically Jains. Radical nonviolence.
I'm thinking it would be gesture controlled. Wifi tracking of the tongue or somesuch.
is this c/shower_shitposts?
You really shouldn't shit in the shower.
Good lord, can you imagine the things that cows would have to say?
and chickens.
/SHUDDER
Ya I was thinking along those lines too. Or biological testing.
And what if you were a diehard "they're just animals", and then they spoke. Would you hang yourself?
OMFG.. the biological testing…
The dog cannot speak. I've seen videos like this and I don't believe them.
He can certainly associate buttons with things that happen, just like other "nonverbal" actions he takes. Or like how he can associate words and commands spoken by people with things.
But he doesn't understand the words in the same way people do. If the buttons didn't make any sounds at all he could develop the same associations.
It may not be "speaking" but it is communicating (relatively) complex concepts.
Dogs with buttons can associate them with people, actions, locations, and emotions, and use those buttons to express those connections, which is by definition communication.
Any dog owner knows they also communicate these things non-verbally by nosing at their leash, pawing at the door, wagging their tail, or dropping a ball in your lap.
What's extra interesting about the dogs with buttons is they will sometimes clearly and communicate emotional ideas without expectation of reward, like FIDO, HAPPY or MOM, GOOD before just laying down to mind their own business.
Sure, they dont understand the context of the Latin root of the word your saying, and they can't read Shakespeare, but they can still communicate ideas, and respond to your actions, like someone learning Chinese for the first time and only picking up every 12th word and relying on context clues.
Their capacity for vocabulary isn't infinite, but it's clearly there.
If the buttons didn't make any sounds at all he could develop the same associations.
By that logic would you say deaf people communicating in sign language are not speaking?
How about Stephen Hawking? You could swap all of the buttons on his computer with Japanese, or a series of beeps and he would eventually figure out how to get the same message across, does that invalidate him using English as his main language of communication?
All those examples of people you gave are still using language. Language can be spoken, written, signed, and more. Maybe my original comment wasn't clear enough when I said "dogs can't speak." Dogs can certainly communicate, as many organisms can, but they can't use language.
Well I don't know if you understand words the way people do either. It's a gray area.
But I've seen it and it sure looks like real speaking to me.
But how about the title question. You got anything to say about that? Riots? Shame-induced mass suicide?