this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
12 points (67.6% liked)

Technology

82227 readers
4495 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 12 points 11 hours ago

"What could be worse than MICROSOFT overseeing open source software? Wait no! It was a rhetorical question!"

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

I hope they call it "SlopTrough"

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Was self-hosting gitlab or foregejo not an option?

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

They’ll probably just fork forgejo add some slight “ai agentic” bullshit and market it as their own product.

I was going to say hopefully the forgejo licence doesn’t allow that but then again, OpenAI have shown they don’t really care about copyright or anything like that

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

Forgejo is licensed under GPLv3, so I think it isn't possible to do so

[–] Melusine@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 3 points 20 hours ago

Correct me if I wrong, but the GPL has the weakpoint of web distribution in the sense that a backend is not shipped to the client, so you can keep a forked GPL product without publishing back. The AGPL was made for this (and the SSPL (I think) is like any network interface needed should be published too).

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 4 points 16 hours ago

It was but then how could they pitch that to investors?

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 6 points 21 hours ago

Those aren’t “agentic” enough.

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

im tired boss

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Why? Seems like a massive waste of resources. We already have several source controls

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

Wasting resources is literally AI's main thing

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 1 point 8 hours ago
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 child)
[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 child)

No, but there are so many other systems already out there that compete with it. Why reinvent the wheel when your company is already bleeding billions?

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 point 13 hours ago

Gotta keep throwing shit at the wall.

[–] gilokee@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago
[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 16 hours ago