this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
482 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

82227 readers
4585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] ianonavy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

There’s nowhere to dump heat! Modern data centers rely on heat exchange systems that move excess waste energy into the air or earth. The servers will be thermally throttled to a crawl.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)
[–] ianonavy@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

Sure you can have fancy liquid cooling to move heat away from the processors, but you still need something to move the heat into. You can radiate it into space, but not quickly enough to do useful work 24/7.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 point 1 day ago
[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, that works well with Starlink for example. But only because it's in low earth orbit. In geostationary orbit You do in fact have a horrible ping.

Not being familiar with the details of this Elon brain fart I would hope they didn't aim for geostationary... Because why?? Then again who knows with that idiot.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 point 2 days ago (1 child)

If it's close enough for respectable latency, it's close enough to experience drag. Given the maddeningly high power/cooling and resultant large surface area, then that satellite will have a tendency to incur re-entry.

So either close enough for "ok" latency but will burn up relatively soon or high enough to keep an orbit longer but terrible latency.

Hmm. Assuming you have some small hydrazine or whatever booster you could maintain a low orbit for a while. But yes not endlessly. That bring said there is a middle ground between 400km and 34000km that might provide for a good orbit and acceptable ping. That all depends on the application of course.