this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
510 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

82227 readers
4603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Well, it was $79.7B to be exact. And what the US government did with that was not cut checks, but rather, purchased stock in the companies.

When it sold the stock it bought from manufacturers, it sold for around $70B. When they sold the approximately $2.4B invested into Ally (an auto financing firm), it sold for $17.2B.

So the money spent in 2008 actually made a profit. It was not distributed to the manufacturers or finance companies at all. Just used to shore up their value to prevent them from going out of business – and more importantly, probably, make sure investors didn't lose money, or at least not too much.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 12 hours ago (1 child)

When you take into account inflation and the overall market gains over that time, they absolutely did not make their money back.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

When you take into account that the original assertion was tht eighty billion was given to the auto manufacturers, I don't think my comment deserves the reaction it got, not a reply like yours.

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 11 hours ago (1 child)

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

Yes.

The only terms under which I could potential accept tax money being used to save a company from a collapse leading to massive layoffs, is if the resulting company is also made entirely employee owned.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

Well, that's not how it would happen and you know it.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago

Then it doesn't happen. Your fear is not my fear.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago

Well, it was $79.7B to be exact.

oh, touche! but that was only after 2008, and not including previous bailouts to Ford. Then, every state, everywhere is paying to either get or keep assembly plants but that does not factor into your selective math.