this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
504 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

82227 readers
4541 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago (37 children)

1,036 km (644 miles) on a single charge under China’s CLTC testing standard.

Does anyone know how realistic this range is? You can get some absurd range from a vehicle if you're driving on a closed course at 60kmh with no air conditioning or entertainment.

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Light-Duty_Vehicle_Test_Cycle

The CLTC testing accounts for the country's higher congestion levels with more frequent stop-and-go and lower speed limits, which lead to increased low-speed driving and longer idling times that benefits electric vehicles.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

WLTP, which is closer to US Highway driving, estimates 800 km. Or 500 Eagles.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, that's still pretty darn impressive.

For better or worse, it's one of those sticking points keeping many away from electric. I was like that several years ago, but I've noticed my driving patterns since then. I can't do electric because I can't afford a new car and even worse I'm an apartment dweller, so there's no infrastructure. But if I could, I absolutely would get a vehicle. Long as it had a couple hundred miles of range, that's all I need (we have a second car anyway, so if we needed longer trips, we're covered). And less battery means moving less mass means even cheaper to run.

But my dad went looking a few years ago and ended up with a gas car again - because they do take trips and drive sometimes, and so the idea of having to recharge, even on infrequent trips, was a sticking point. But with 500 miles of range, it's getting to the point where that's getting close to a day's comfortable driving for a lot of people, and if you can charge overnight, then it becomes enough for trips and it helps eliminate the range anxiety.

I think once people start transitioning over to electric, their second vehicle might have less range…

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 15 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

Right, so you're not getting anywhere near that on the open road.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 child)

Right. Open road should be more around 770Km. I have a BYD Han 2023 that has a claimed range of 550Km, and I get just about 420Km realistically, at a steady 110Km/h with a few bursts of up to 150Km/h to get away from idiots doing 80 on a 100 (or just to show off the torque to other types of idiots like BMW and some Tesla drivers 😏). I do still get a bit over the claimed 550 if I don't leave the city and drive as if I was afraid of tickets.

load more comments (1 reply)
load more comments (1 reply)
[–] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Came across this which I've not validated but does seem to make sense at a glance: Comparison of WLTP and CLTC

Based on that the WLTP range would be 828-900km (515-560 miles).

Real world, 6-700km at a guess?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›