this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
654 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

82227 readers
4546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (19 children)

Many people here are going off on wild tangents over this. You should just read the law, it's only a couple thousand words of quite plain English.

Many here have taken completely incorrect assumptions from the title. This law is for developers, not users.

Summary:

  1. Requires OS devs ask for DOB, age, or both at account creation time.
  2. Requires an API that allows app store devs to request this age data for the account. At minimum this API must signal that the account is a member of one of these categories: 'user under 13, user over 13 and under 16, user is over 16 and under 18, user is over 18'.
  3. Explicitly bars OS devs from sending more data than explicitly necessary to meet 1 (hint: photo ID, facial recognition).
  4. Explicitly bars app devs recieving the data from requesting more data from the OS nor the App store.
  5. Bars app stores from using the data for any other reason and specifically calls out anticompetitive practices.
  6. Bars app store and OS devs from sharing this data with any third party for any other reason than to comply with this law.
  7. Has injunctions and civil penalties of $2500 (max per user) affected by negligent violations (eg a child account is served adult content), and $7500 (max per user) affected by intentional violations.

The only problem I have with this is that it should only apply to commercial software (app stores and OS). Libre/FOS software should not have to police ages on their app stores, due to their far reduced budgets (often zero), developer time, and the nature of the software being generally anti-centralized and anti-surveillance-capitalism. Though I'd be fine with it for FOSS software distributed via commercial app stores, as long as they gave a longer lead time to implement (EG a couple of years).

[–] recked_wralph@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Im not sure I understand your point about this law being for developers not users.

The fines may only be applied to operating system developers for failing to implement these systems… but having those systems at all still drastically impacts end users in a negative way.

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 12 hours ago (1 child)

Go read the bill, particularly section 1798.501.b, 1798.502.a and b. Every developer of every application that can be downloaded from every package system MUST request your age bracket every time it is downloaded. And possibly every time it is launched. Basic utilities like ‘ls’ and ‘cat’, that pong example I pushed as a test, everything.

[–] recked_wralph@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

Yeah I agree. And while the onus of that implementation is on developers to comply with the law, there is still negative impact on end users by creating those barriers.

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

I think we’re in violent agreement. It has a huge impact on both end users and hobbyists, and open source developers.

I have some things I’ve developed in the classic “scratch an itch” approach and published for the handful of people who might use it. Now I’m liable for $2500-$7500 if a kid runs 10 lines of code?

[–] recked_wralph@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

1000%

And TIL the phrase “violent agreement” 😆

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)