this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
378 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

82227 readers
4585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Because each sensor broadcasts a fixed unique ID, the same car can be recognized repeatedly without reading a license plate. This makes TPMS-based tracking cheaper, harder to detect, and more difficult to avoid than camera-based surveillance, and therefore a stronger privacy threat.

This seems like a real stretch.

Cameras and automated license plate recognition are absurdly cheap at this point. And cameras have much greater range and reliability than whatever wireless signal interception this is, which the researchers have said is effective up to 50 meters.

Meanwhile, from the office where I sit (which happens to be more than 50 meters above street level), I can see a highway and read the license plates of all the cars maybe 100-300m away. Plug in a cheap phone as a simple webcam and I can probably log all the license plates that drive by, maybe even correlate that to makes and models of vehicles for redundancy.

And who's going to detect that I've got a cell phone camera pointed out of my office window, or that I'm running that type of image recognition on the phone?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago (6 children)

This seems like a real stretch.

TPMS signals are too weak to read even 6 ft from the wheels.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No they aren't. Out of curiosity I setup an rtlsdr and connected it via RTL-HAOS to my home assistant server.

The antenna is in the middle of my house and over the last month I have logged over 200 different tire pressure sensor id's

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 1 point 23 hours ago

Yep, through misunderstanding I left rtl_433 auto addition switched on for over a year.
I think I ended up with over 9000 unique tpms entries.
Clearing them out from MQTT was a pain in the backside, too!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)